Washington Post Regains Focus on Quality Journalism After 12 Months of Strife
In a break from the stormy headlines surrounding The Washington Post, executive editor Matt Murray feels a sense of relief as he highlights the journalism at the forefront.
The Post hasn't pulled any punches when it comes to exposing the Trump Administration for the past year. Reporters have been working tirelessly, with notable efforts like the "100 scoops in 100 days" project on the Administration's first weeks. This drive for truth extends to numerous important topics, such as the impact of Department of Government Efficiency-inspired cuts on medical research and Social Security services.
However, it hasn't all been smooth sailing. There's been a series of negative headlines surrounding the Post, including the botched reorganization that forced former executive editor Sally Buzbee's resignation. Axions about the outlet's direction and departures among journalists have also caused concern.
Despite these challenges, Murray remains committed to the journalism. He believes that the Post has a historic obligation to scrutinize and report on the government—especially given the Trump administration's drive for change. And it seems that their efforts have made an impact.
Margaret Sullivan, a former media columnist at the Post, has been happy to see the Post breaking stories and standing up against the administration, pointing to ownership and management issues as the real causes for their struggle. The Post haven't quite earned their own meme on Truth Social (Trump's social media platform), but they've certainly gotten under his skin. White House labels have branded their stories as "fake news," while Tulsi Gabbard, national intelligence director, has cited Post stories among her reasons to seek out internal leakers.
When it comes to the opinion section, Bezos' involvement has sparked debates. Last fall, a planned endorsement of Trump opponent Kamala Harris was spiked, leading to an exodus of angry subscribers. Bezos' newfound friendliness with Trump and his priorities for the opinion section—focusing on personal liberties and the free market—led to the resignations of editorial page editor David Shipley and columnists Ruth Marcus and Eugene Robinson.
In terms of talent, the Post has suffered some notable defections at the end of 2025. Matea Gold, the respected managing editor, along with journalists Josh Dawsey, Ashley Parker, Philip Rucker, and Michael Scherer, joined other media outlets. This raised concerns about thin skin within the organization, with Murray temporarily banning goodbye emails before reversing the decision. The paper has since banned its media writers from reporting on the newspaper itself.
Despite these hurdles, the Post is still a desired destination for journalists. Richard Prince, a veteran Post reporter and editor, notes that the reporters are doing good work, although the turmoil from the top can be disheartening. It appears that the Post is still in transition, with Murray recently appointing key deputies and promising more resources in areas like technology, artificial intelligence, and the markets. They've reportedly lost some 325,000 subscribers after the Harris non-endorsement and editorial policy change, but they're looking to recoup that loss with new and returning subscribers.
All in all, it seems that the Post is experiencing a spring surge after a tough winter. While some weaknesses persist, the commitment to fearless journalism remains unwavering. Whether you're a regular reader or just keeping an eye on the news, The Washington Post is a vital and relevant source of information in today's tumultuous political landscape.
- The government's policies, such as those implemented by the Department of Government Efficiency, have been subject to scrutiny by The Washington Post's journalists.
- In the realm of entertainment, the White House has branded some of The Washington Post's stories as "fake news."
- The IRS might find notable changes in lifestyle and home-and-garden expenses as sustainable living becomes more prevalent.
- The journalism field has experienced a wave of layoffs in late 2025, with several journalists leaving The Washington Post.
- In the year 2024, the exposure of internal leakers by national intelligence directors could be influenced by reports from publications like The Washington Post.
- The opinion section of The Washington Post has seen debates arise due to Jeff Bezos' involvement and shift in priorities, leading to notable resignations.
- The technology sector might see increased resources and focus at The Washington Post, as indicated by Murray's recent appointments and promises.
